Press "Enter" to skip to content

Advisory Committee Seeks Changes In Planned Remote Sensing Rules

Reportedly, an industry advisory group would suggest prominent changes to a proposal to modify commercial remote sensing laws, arguing the present proposal falls short of what is required to keep up with the industry’s needs and capabilities. The members of the ACCRES (Advisory Committee on Commercial Remote Sensing) had a long meeting at the U.S. DOC (Department of Commerce) for discussing a notice of planned rulemaking published by NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration) that will make the first main modifications to how profitable satellite imaging systems are controlled since 2006. The proposed rule is planned to modernize how such systems are sanctioned by NOAA as the quantity of license applications the office gets surges.

Nevertheless, several ACCRES members disputed that proposal missed the smear and can produce new burdens for firms. Gil Klinger—Chair of ACCRES and Raytheon’s VP, who spent most of his professional tenure at the U.S. DoD (Department of Defense) and the intelligence community—said, “At the moment, I feel that the draft rule is required across the board and it is not close.” His committee held an extensive discussion of the planned regulation that brought up a range of troubles with it. One is a plan to identify license applicants as either “high-risk or low-risk.” As per NOAA’s overview of the regulation, an analysis of past applications stated that around 40% of systems will be considered low-risk.

Recently, Raytheon was in news for obtaining a small business mentoring deal. The defense contractor company lately secured a 2-Year agreement for the Air Force Mentor-Protege program to assist in ITS (Infinity Technology Services) in boosting its cybersecurity services outlay. Bill Sullivan—VP of Raytheon’s Intelligence, Information, and Services Business—stated, “Supporting small business is a great thing for the administration, as well as Raytheon, and ITS presents an exclusive understanding of the Air Force operation from several operational perspectives.”